Not logged in. · Lost password · Register
Page:  1  2  3 ... 121  122  123  next 

All posts by ach (1839)

topic: Move "not maintained anymore" plugins to a separate section ?  in the forum: Community dokuwiki.org
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #1
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
Quote by FosseWay on 2019-05-21, 18:27:
Is the [anonymized] plugin popularity/usage data available publicly?

See the popularity page on the wiki. When you look at the wiki code, you will find that the popularity plugin has an API. You can find out most things by checking https://dokuwiki.org/lib/plugins/pluginrepo/popularity.php?key=version&foo=bar while all the keys are what you will also find in your own wiki's Popularity Feedback plugin.
topic: Fragen eines Neueinsteigers als Entscheidungshilfe, ob DokuWiki das richtige Werkzeug ist.  in the forum: Non-English Discussion German discussion
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #2
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 66115
Quote by eve on 2019-05-18, 09:13:
MediaWiki bietet wohl mehr Skalierbarkeit und Flexibilität

Da wuerde ich fast das Gegenteil behaupten wollen. Viele meinen DokuWiki waere nicht so skalierbar, weil es keine Datenbank nutzt. Dazu kann ich die FAQ dazu waermstens empfehlen. Ich habe MediaWiki nie administriert, aber von anderen hab ich gehoert habe, dass es gar nicht so flexibel ist.

Andere Alternativen, vor allem wenn man nichts oeffentlich im Web braucht und nur mit privaten Leuten teilt, sind Joplin (nutzt Markdown und speichert Inhalte in einer Datenbank, die aber als Textdateien exportiert werden kann, es kann auch ueber einen Umweg OneNote-Inhalte importieren) und Zim (nutzt im Prinzip dieselbe Syntax wie DokuWiki und speichert Inhalte auch in Textdateien). Man kann dann die Dateien im Cloud-Speicher deiner Wahl teilen.

In einem anderen Thread schreibt jemand, wie sie es geschafft haben, OneNote nach DokuWiki zu konvertieren. Es scheint aber sehr schwierig gewesen zu sein, also nicht unbedingt zu empfehlen.
topic: templates and the new menu-system  in the forum: General Help and Support Development
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #3
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 63922
I planned to add the new menu system to the Starter template so that it's easier for others to start using it. But I gave up after a while as it was too difficult for me. I'm not sure if what I need to do is even possible.
If any volunteers want to make that change, I'd be very happy to review and merge it.
topic: Possibility for "good purpose only" contributions to DW? (a "holly", "generosity only" forge)  in the forum: General Help and Support General Stuff
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #4
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 65567
I'm not sure, but from what I understand, you're asking if DokuWiki as a whole (or maybe just a plugin? or something else?) could have a license that would permit only "doing good things" with it?

Unfortunately, such a thing would be against the Open Source spirit (and license, legal implications, etc). The freedoms that Open Source gives includes the freedom to "do evil" or anything else, otherwise it wouldn't be really open.
On top of that it's a big moral question who decides what a "good purpose" is?

You might be interested to know that there have been failed attempts to include such a clause in Open Source projects. Some more info on that:
topic: [closed] Inline formatting in headings  in the forum: General Help and Support Syntax and Usage
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #5
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 64187
See https://www.dokuwiki.org/faq:headerlinks
topic: [SOLVED] Template only for special pagenames  in the forum: General Help and Support Templates and Layout
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #6
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 64109
The LoadSkin plugin can change the template per page or per namespace.
topic: Dual language view /edit - translation localization and more tool  in the forum: General Help and Support Plugins
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #7
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 63620
So, the purpose of this would be to help translating larger texts?

I doubt any possible solution for that would work well on mobile.

Maybe such a thing is out of scope of what DokuWiki can do. It's probably possible to build something somehow but it might be better to use a different tool built for that purpose.
topic: Dual language view /edit - translation localization and more tool  in the forum: General Help and Support Plugins
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #8
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 63612
Knowing the use case would be helpful. You give us the solution but we might be able to help more if you gave us the needs.

I can think of two things but I'm sure there must be more ways of doing it.

Depending on the size of the text to be translated, it could be done with a table or columns (for example using the Wrap plugin) and simply writing one language in the one and another in the other column. Although invisible, it would be quite important for search engines and screen readers, etc to set the language for each bit via the lang attribute, which can also be done with the Wrap plugin (e.g. <WRAP :en>This is English.</WRAP>).

Something which can show a translation nearly alongside a text could be done with the Editions plugin. It's not quite what you asked and it's really very specific to different editions of the same text. But as I don't know your use case, it could work.
topic: Using DokuWiki formatted text files independent of Dokuwiki?  in the forum: General Help and Support Features and Functionality
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #9
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 63595
A while ago I had planned to write a Zim template and get together all plugins necessary for getting more of a Zim experience with DokuWiki. Unfortunately I'm not very active in DokuWiki anymore, although I hope to come back at some point in the future.

I doubt that the two code bases could ever be maintained in one spot. They were built with two different programming languages and serve different purposes. But some kind of collaboration could make sense.

What would be the main things you'd like to be joined up about them? I suspect it's mainly the syntax?
This post was edited on 2018-11-13, 20:42 by ach.
topic: Using DokuWiki formatted text files independent of Dokuwiki?  in the forum: General Help and Support Features and Functionality
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #10
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 63529
I'm also surprised that this is not something any of the hundreds of Markdown tools seem to have.

The only thing that comes quite close to it in the DokuWiki space is Zim. Most of Zim's syntax is DokuWiki syntax, and you can use it like a notebook and also export to a joined up website.
topic: differnt desings for namespaces  in the forum: General Help and Support Templates and Layout
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #11
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 62010
You can use the Loadskin plugin for that.
topic: wo kann ich <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> plazieren?  in the forum: Non-English Discussion German discussion
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #12
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 62003
Mehr Informationen zur urspruenglichen Frage:
Wenn Suchmaschinen die Seiten gar nicht aufrufen koennen, weil sie wegen der ACL ausgesperrt sind, dann braucht man die Zeile <meta name="robots" content="noindex" /> gar nicht. Suchmaschinen koennen nichts indizieren was sie nicht lesen koennen.
Ausserdem wird diese Zeile automatisch schon angezeigt wenn man ausgeloggt ist, wie die Suchmaschinen, weil das Loginformular angezeigt wird und nicht die Seite.
topic: IE 9 Javascript Fehler nach Update auf Greebo  in the forum: Non-English Discussion German discussion
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #13
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 61221
Das Gute ist ja, dass DokuWiki auch ohne JavaScript funktioniert. Nur gibt's halt keine Extra-Hilfe.
topic: Too Many Calls (One click to a page creates a minimum of three hits instead of one!)  in the forum: General Help and Support Features and Functionality
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #14
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 61654
That is normal for DokuWiki, but in general it is quite unusual that the number of requests is so very little. Most websites have many many more.
E.g. Google.co.uk has 33 requests, a Wikipedia article without any extra images has 23 requests, a random BBC News article has 90 requests, a random NYtimes.com article 162 requests. Not all of them will go to the same server (due to ad-related external scripts and assets often being loaded from other servers), but about half of them will.

So, DokuWiki is actually really good in that respect compared to other websites and tools.
It seems your hosting provider (is that what Imunify360 is?) is not very good, though. That amount of hits should not be a problem for them.
topic: HTML Forbidden?  in the forum: General Help and Support Syntax and Usage
Avatar
ach (Administrator) #15
Member since May 2006 · 1910 posts · Location: Folkestone, UK
Group memberships: Administrators, Members, Super Mods, Wiki Managers
Show profile · Link to this post
In reply to post ID 61623
It's probably this: https://www.dokuwiki.org/faq:mod_security
Close Smaller – Larger + Reply to this post:
Special characters:
Page:  1  2  3 ... 121  122  123  next 
Special queries
Go to forum
Imprint
This board is powered by the Unclassified NewsBoard software, 20150713-dev, © 2003-2015 by Yves Goergen
Current time: 2019-05-27, 13:35:04 (UTC +02:00)